Academic Program for
HIST 730
The requirements of the reading seminar are straightforward. The main ones are two. 1.
Read the
core texts and post comments about them to the list, the Coffee Klatch.
When you have read each book, prepare to post your comments to the Coffee Klatch by reviewing the page on discussing the core texts. 2.
Pursue
readings on a topic in regional history of particular interest to you and
report back to the list in a review essay. This assignment is an opportunity for you to pursue a
concentration of readings on a topic of particular interest to you in the
history of the What topic should you choose? Likely there is something of particular interest to you already, but if you'd like some suggestions, correspond with Prof. Isern. How will you select the books? Prof. Isern's Bibliography of the North American Plains, from his HIST 431 course, may be a useful reference. You also already may know titles you would like to suggest. Prof. Isern often can suggest titles around a given subject. Finally, you may have to do some bibliographic work on your own to fill out the list. A starting point might be the online catalog of NDSU and allied libraries. Once you have decided on the books for the review essay, it will be your responsibility to get them. For this you will have to rely on your local library and inter-library loan—so get started early! Get your list of books together and get the loan orders out in good time. As you prepare for and write the review essay, please observe these specifications for the review essay. Two Additional
Course Requirements 1. Read the work of your colleagues and participate in discussions via the list. 2. Offer
occasional reports to the list on some texts other than books that tell the
story of life on the Determining Grades
and Assessing Learning The evaluation of work done in the seminar is qualitative, but structured. Each student receives three letter grades for the course, and the three are averaged to arrive at a final grade. The table below summarizes the basis for the letter grades.
Assessment means checking up on the progress of learning in a course, with an eye to improvement of the learning situation. Suggestions for improvement of content, methods, or operations in general are always welcome. Feel free at any time to send suggestions to Prof. Isern. At times, too, he may post a question to the list asking how best to handle some matter pertaining to the seminar, and he appreciates your help in that regard. When you conclude your work in the seminar, he asks that you complete a summative assessment in the form of an e-mail. In your message, please address the following. · Please comment on your experience with the core texts (Webb, Cather, Stegner) of the seminar. Were these engaging, worthwhile readings for you? Did you benefit from discussing them? · Please comment on the independent readings and review essay component of the seminar. Were expectations clear and reasonable? Did you benefit from this assignment? · Please comment on the general participation and discussion that took place via the list. Did this provide a good seminar framework for you? Do you have suggestions for its improvement? · Please comment on the logistics of the course--the technologies and methods for its operation. Did you have any problems that could be corrected for the benefit of those following? Have you any suggestions for improvements? · Any other comments? |