ICES Course evaluations for Math 315, Section D-1, Spring 2001

Item54321OMITMeanStd. Dev.
1. Rate the instructor's overall Exceptionally high Exceptionally low
teaching effectiveness. 79% 10% 3% 3% 0% 3% 4.7 0.7
2. Rate the overall quality Exceptionally high Exceptionally low
of this course. 55% 24% 10% 3% 3% 3% 4.3 1.0
3. Was the instructor well prepared Almost always Almost never
for his/her classes? 93% 7 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 4.9 0.3
4. Did the instructor encourage student To a great extent Not at all
questions? 93% 7 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 4.9 0.3
5. Feedback on my course progress through Very adequate Very inadequate
homework or quizzes, and tests was: 62% 31% 3% 3% 0% 0% 4.5 0.7
6. If this course required a departmental Very adequately Not very well
exam, this instructor would prepare you: 72% 28% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4.7 0.4
7. If you took another math course, would Yes, definitely No, definitely not
you want to take it from this instructor? 90% 3 % 0% 7% 0% 0% 4.8 0.8
8. Rate the overall effectiveness Exceptionally high Exceptionally low
of the instructor. 79% 14 % 7% 0% 0% 0% 4.7 0.6
9. The workload for this course was Light Heavy
3% 0 % 66% 28% 3% 0% 4.2 1.2
10. The instructor was receptive to Very receptive Not at all receptive
student questions 93% 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% 4.9 0.4
11. Exams/papers reflected material covered. To a great extent Very little
76% 17% 3% 3% 0% 0% 4.7 0.7
12. Grading procedures for the course were Very fair Very unfair
55% 21 % 21% 0% 3% 0% 4.2 1.0
13. How enthusiastic was the instructor Very Not at all
about teaching? 93% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4.9 0.3