How Proposals Are Evaluated
Grant Review Committees evaluate each proposal using the following criteria.
Importance of the Problem
Proposals should clearly identify the agricultural issue, challenge, or opportunity being addressed and explain its significance to North Dakota producers, commodity groups, or agricultural industries.
Reviewers consider:
- The importance and relevance of the problem.
- The need for the proposed research.
- The potential benefits to North Dakota agriculture.
- The likelihood that project outcomes will address an identified industry need.
Potential Impact
Projects should demonstrate meaningful outcomes and measurable benefits for agricultural stakeholders.
Reviewers consider:
- Economic impact and return on investment.
- Potential improvements in productivity, efficiency, quality, or profitability.
- Benefits to agricultural producers, industries, and consumers.
- Opportunities to advance agricultural knowledge and future research efforts.
Innovation and Advancement
Preference is given to projects that generate new knowledge, technologies, management practices, or production systems.
Reviewers assess:
- Originality of the proposed research.
- Potential to address emerging challenges or opportunities.
- Contribution to scientific knowledge and agricultural advancement.
Funding is generally intended to support research that expands current knowledge rather than routine testing, standard demonstrations, or activities with predictable outcomes.
Scientific and Technical Merit
Projects should be supported by sound research methods and a clear plan of work.
Reviewers consider:
- Appropriateness of the research design.
- Quality and feasibility of proposed methods.
- Clarity of objectives and expected outcomes.
- Adequacy of data collection and analysis plans.
Investigator Qualifications and Resources
Successful projects require qualified personnel and appropriate resources to achieve project objectives.
Reviewers evaluate:
- Experience and expertise of the project team.
- Demonstrated ability to complete similar research.
- Availability of facilities, equipment, and support resources.
- Partnerships that strengthen project outcomes.
Budget and Use of Funds
Budgets should be reasonable, justified, and directly related to project objectives.
Reviewers consider:
- Cost effectiveness of the proposed work.
- Appropriateness of requested expenditures.
- Availability of matching funds when required.
- Efficient use of Agricultural Research Fund resources.
Matching Funds Requirements
Matching funds requirements vary by funding category.
Commodity Research
- Projects led by North Dakota institutions must provide a minimum match equal to 25% of the amount requested.
- Projects led by organizations outside North Dakota generally require a dollar-for-dollar (1:1) match.
Animal Agriculture Research
- Matching funds are not required but may strengthen a proposal.
New and Emerging Crop Research
- Matching funds are not required but may strengthen a proposal.
Collaborative and Regional Projects
Collaborative and multi-state projects may be considered when they address issues relevant to North Dakota agriculture.
Applicants should clearly demonstrate:
- Direct benefits to North Dakota producers or industries.
- The role and contribution of each participating organization.
- Why collaboration is necessary to achieve project objectives.
Award Considerations
The Agricultural Research Fund does not establish fixed minimum or maximum award amounts.
Funding recommendations may include:
- Full funding of the request.
- Partial funding of selected project components.
- Reduced project scope based on available funds.
Funding decisions are based on proposal quality, reviewer recommendations, available funding, and alignment with Agricultural Research Fund priorities.
Project Duration
Most projects are funded for one to two years; however, longer-term projects may be considered when justified.
- Projects may extend up to five years.
- Multi-year projects are subject to annual progress review.
- Continued funding may depend upon satisfactory progress toward project objectives.
Multiple Proposal Submissions
Applicants may submit more than one proposal during a funding cycle provided that each proposal represents a distinct research project with separate objectives and budgets.
Eligible and Ineligible Expenses
Eligible Expenses - Agricultural Research Fund awards may support expenses such as:
- Research personnel and technical support staff.
- Equipment directly related to project objectives.
- Research supplies and materials.
- Travel necessary to conduct the research.
- Laboratory and analytical services.
- Data collection, analysis, and publication costs.
- Professional services that support project objectives.
Equipment Purchases - Equipment requests must:
- Be necessary to achieve project objectives.
- Include appropriate cost justification.
- Be supported by a vendor quotation when required.
Ineligible Expenses - Agricultural Research Fund awards may not be used for:
- Indirect costs or overhead charges.
- General-purpose office equipment and furnishings.
- Routine administrative expenses unrelated to project objectives.
Final Funding Decisions
Grant Review Committees evaluate and rank proposals within their respective funding categories and make funding recommendations. Award recommendations are subject to final approval through the established Agricultural Research Fund review process.
Applicants are encouraged to review the Policies and Procedures, Frequently Asked Questions, and current Call for Proposals before preparing and submitting an application.